Every generation was in evidence at the event in Trafalgar
Square, individuals as well as groups including Anonymous; People's Unity; those fighting to
survive on newly slashed disability benefits; mothers calling, imploring and
pleading for the return of their children who are in the 'care' system; those
hit by cruel cuts to benefits or additions to cost like the bedroom tax; lots
of gorgeous faces I know from the tents at the steps of St Paul's during Occupythe London Stock Exchange; environmental activists, tax justice activists’
defenders of the NHS and those who, through social media like Facebook and
Twitter... came to find their own way to share a desire for change to the way
we are governed. We were not masses... but we were representative and numerous.
Everyone was there for a reason and each of us must have
been questioning if we truly live in a democracy; as the female police officer
stopped me and held me in place, it confirmed what I already surmised - THIS is
NOT what democracy looks like. She had no cause and no right to stop me or anyone
else on this perfectly peaceful walk from Trafalgar Square to Parliament and
back; NO weapons, NO threats, NO militant groups- just people who can't get
themselves heard in any other way.
Since 15 October 2011 I have been to quite a few events
(demonstrations/protests etc don't really describe these gatherings)... and on
EVERY one, it has been the same sense of 'them & us' with the London police.
THEY come looking for trouble and end up ensuring it by their behaviour towards
us.
Where is MY police protection? Why aren't THEY looking to
facilitate my RIGHT to protest ...and ensuring aggressive behaviour is
minimised by contributing to the atmosphere with co-operative, polite,
respectful actions? I and those I had the honour to walk beside on 4th May 2013
in London... are NOT criminals and do NOT deserve to be treated as if we are.
Here is an insight into the lunacy of this common method of
policing our democratic right to protest... I asked the police woman who was
stopping my progress, why she was and she said: "you have to stay
here" - I replied that I didn't want to and would like to carry on walking
...and then asked if there was a specific law or reason to stop me. She said
she was stopping me under 'section 3' - I HAD to ask what this meant
as she didn't say any more (must have assumed I was
well-aquatinted with this sort of legal definition). She said it was because
there was:
"...the possibility I might be going to commit a crime"
Let me just mention at this point that aside from being a
five-foot grandma without a weapon... I was wearing a big pink sheet and a
smile. There was no logic to her behaviour and her attitude was rude,
dictatorial and aggressive - mine was polite, friendly and peaceable.
Thankfully those of us there sort of propelled forward so that it wasn't just me
breaking the police line that was attempting to kettle us ...more of a gentle
yet sufficient surge.
The kettling attempts by the police kept happening over and
over in the few hours from gathering and walking, to disbursing - YET there
wasn't a single incident that called for kettling. My sister (also wearing a
pink sheet and lovely smile) suggested to a young officer that it would make
more sense to just let us get on as we would eventually finish walking, carrying signs, expressing our concerns and generally trying to make our demands of OUR democracy. He actually looked somewhat sympathetic for a moment.
We understand that the police will be about at events ...but there was NO need
at all, at ANY stage to kettle.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for taking the time to add your voice to mine x